The government has published the results of a survey of over 2,000 employers on their awareness of correct right to work checks. What do the results show?
The government has published the results of a survey of over 2,000 employers on their awareness of correct right to work checks. What do the results show?
The results show that employers understand basic right to work check requirements but lack knowledge of key details. This lack of knowledge was particularly acute amongst small employers.
80% of the employers surveyed answered at least one compliance question incorrectly. In particular:
- 11% didn’t say that all employers in the UK are responsible for carrying out right to work checks
- 51% thought a UK driving licence or bank statement could be accepted as proof of right to work - neither of these are ever acceptable documents
- 12% didn’t check manual documents correctly
- 64% thought they were required to recheck all employees’ documents every five years - this is not the case as some employees have a permanent right to work in the UK (such as British and Irish citizens and also EU citizens with status under the EU Settlement Scheme) and so don’t need any follow-up check and, for those who only have time-limited permission to work in the UK, a follow-up check must be conducted on them on or before the expiry of their current permission
- 17% didn’t keep records for the correct length of time - this should be the length of the employment plus an additional two years.
It’s advisable to use the employer’s guide to right to work checks to help you conduct compliant right to work checks on all new recruits before they start work. It will help you with understanding why you need to do right to work checks, how to carry them out, when to carry out initial checks and follow-up checks and what documents are acceptable for a manual right to work check.
Related Topics
-
Could HMRC recategorise your subcontractors?
You use subcontractors for all your building projects and almost always the same individuals. You’ve heard that this could increase the risk of HMRC recategorising them as employees. What steps can you take to counter this?
-
Tribunal rejects reliance on adviser as reasonable excuse
A recent First-tier Tribunal decision has confirmed that relying on an accountant does not automatically amount to a reasonable excuse for missing a self-assessment deadline. The case highlights the limits of delegating tax responsibilities. What does this mean in practice?
-
HMRC issues new wave of offshore “nudge” letters
HMRC has issued a further round of “nudge” letters targeting individuals it believes may have undeclared offshore income or gains. The letters form part of HMRC’s ongoing use of data from international information exchange agreements. What should you do if you receive one?





This website uses both its own and third-party cookies to analyze our services and navigation on our website in order to improve its contents (analytical purposes: measure visits and sources of web traffic). The legal basis is the consent of the user, except in the case of basic cookies, which are essential to navigate this website.