No HICBC reform: a closer look
The 2024 Autumn Budget made headlines for a number of reasons, but behind the flagship announcements was an important confirmation that planned reforms to how families are subject to the child benefit clawback will be scrapped. What’s the full story?

Background
The high-income child benefit charge (HICBC) has been controversial since its introduction. For one thing, it is assessed on the higher earner, irrespective of whether they are the claimant. This has led to a number of instances where couples who don’t necessarily share financial information between them have been hit with unexpected bills and (in some cases penalties). HICBC has also been criticised for unfairly punishing single-income claimants because it only takes into account the higher earner’s income, not total household income.
Example. For 2024/25, A and B claimed child benefit of just over £2,300. B is currently on extended leave and did not work during the year. A is working full time and, with their annual bonus, have exceeded £80,000. HICBC will apply and clawback the £2,300 in full. C and D also claimed the same amount of benefit. However, both worked during 2024/25 earning just under £60,000 each. There will be no clawback, even though as a household their income is £40,000 higher than A and B.
Reform
The previous government acknowledged this problem, and announced that it would consult on how to reform the HICBC rules to base it on household income.
This plan has now been scrapped by the incoming government. Advise clients to review income sharing arrangements, e.g. rental income, savings, profit extraction, to preserve entitlement.
Instead, the government is focusing on improving collection of the charge. Employees subject to the charge will be able to pay it via a PAYE code adjustment instead of needing to complete a tax return from 2025/26. This will remove the risk of failure to notify and late filing penalties being applied for some claimants.
Related Topics
-
Cutting the cost of a company car
You want to help your young son replace the ancient car he currently drives. The plan is for your company to buy it but for the running costs to be met by your son. That’s fine with him but is there a more tax and cost-effective alternative?
-
Meaning of “new and unused” clarified for CAs purposes
The guidance on what “new and unused” means for the purposes of first-year allowances has been updated in order to make things clearer. What’s the full story?
-
Scammers already targeting pensioners over winter fuel payments
Phishing attacks are already being sent to pensioners purporting to be from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). What’s going on and how can you avoid becoming a victim?